RT Book, Section A1 Paul, Subroto A1 Zellos, Lambros A2 Sugarbaker, David J. A2 Bueno, Raphael A2 Burt, Bryan M. A2 Groth, Shawn S. A2 Loor, Gabriel A2 Wolf, Andrea S. A2 Williams, Marcia A2 Adams, Ann SR Print(0) ID 1170407131 T1 Techniques and Indications for Esophageal Exclusion T2 Sugarbaker’s Adult Chest Surgery, 3e YR 2020 FD 2020 PB McGraw-Hill Education PP New York, NY SN 9781260026931 LK accesssurgery.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1170407131 RD 2024/04/24 AB The four main causes of esophageal perforation are spontaneous perforation associated with protracted vomiting, also known as Boerhaave syndrome; iatrogenic injury from instrumentation; breakdown of esophageal reconstructions after esophagectomy; and penetrating trauma.1–4 Regardless of the etiology, mediastinal contamination from salivary, gastric, and biliary secretions, with the associated bacteria, leads to both local and systemic inflammatory responses. If the perforation is not controlled promptly, it will give rise to sepsis, which if left untreated will result in mortality within 1 week.1,4,5 Despite advances in surgical technique and critical care over the past decades, esophageal perforation remains a challenging clinical problem. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment are the hallmarks of successful outcome after spontaneous (i.e., Boerhaave syndrome) and iatrogenic esophageal perforation. Advocates for primary esophageal repair, drainage with a T-tube, esophageal exclusion, esophageal diversion, and esophagectomy with upfront reconstruction for perforations can be found. Recent developments include endoscopic interventions including stenting, suturing, or vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy.6–9 The trend has been to preserve esophageal continuity if possible. This goal, although optimal, is not always feasible. This chapter describes the techniques and indications for esophageal exclusion.