1. Jansen EW, Borst C, Lahpor JR, Grundeman PF, Eefting FD, et al: Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass using the octopus method: results in the first one hundred patients.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116(1):60-67.
[PubMed: 9671898]
2. Vanermen H: What is minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
J Card Surg 1998; 13(4):268-274.
[PubMed: 10225183]
3. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, et al: Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration.
Lancet 1994; 344(8922):563-570.
[PubMed: 7914958]
4. Aybek T, Kessler P, Khan MF, Dogan S, Neidhart G, et al: Operative techniques in awake coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125(6):1394-1400.
[PubMed: 12830059]
5. Leather HA, Vuylsteke A, Bert C, M'Fam W, Segers P, et al: Evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output monitor in off-pump coronary artery surgery.
Anaesthesia 2004; 59(4):385-389.
[PubMed: 15023110]
6. Falk V: Manual control and tracking—a human factor analysis relevant for beating heart surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74(2):624-628.
[PubMed: 12173870]
7. Bouchot O, Aubin MC, Carrier M, Cohn WE, Perrault LP: Temporary coronary artery occlusion during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with the new poloxamer P407 does not cause endothelial dysfunction in epicardial coronary arteries.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132(5): 1144-1149.
[PubMed: 17059936]
8. Mommerot A, Aubin MC, Carrier M, Cohn W, Perrault LP: Use of the purified poloxamer 407 for temporary coronary occlusion in off-pump CABG does not cause myocardial injury. Innovations 2007; 2:201-204.
9. Lev-Ran O, Braunstein R, Sharony R, Kramer A, Paz Y, et al: No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: the effect on stroke.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129(2):307-313.
[PubMed: 15678040]
10. Brereton RJ, Misfeld M, Ross DE: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting.
NEJM 2009; 360(25):2673; author reply 2674-2675.
[PubMed: 19537315]
11. Vallely MP, Potger K, McMillan D, Hemli JM, Brady PW, et al: Anaortic techniques reduce neurological morbidity after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Heart Lung Circ 2008; 17(4):299-304.
[PubMed: 18294911]
12. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Cirmeni S, et al: Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73(5): 1387-1393.
[PubMed: 12022522]
13. Prapas SN, Panagiotopoulos IA, Hamed Abdelsalam A, Kotsis VN, Protogeros DA, et al: Predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation following aorta no-touch off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32(3):488-492.
[PubMed: 17651981]
14. Rastan AJ, Eckenstein JI, Hentschel B, Funkat AK, Gummert JF, et al: Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies. Circulation 2006; 114(1 Suppl):I477-485.
15. Edgerton JR, Herbert MA, Jones KK, Prince SL, Acuff T, et al: On-pump beating heart surgery offers an alternative for unstable patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Heart Surg Forum 2004; 7(1):8-15.
[PubMed: 14980839]
16. Sergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, Bert C, Van Hemelrijck J, et al: OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25(5):779-785.
[PubMed: 15082282]
17. Puskas J, Cheng D, Knight J, Angelini G, DeCannier D, et al: Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and consensus statement from The 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations 2005; 1(1):3-27.
18. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, Houghtaling PL, Gillinov AM, et al: Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(1):142-148.
[PubMed: 14752424]
19. Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J, Zuckermann A, Grubhofer G, et al: Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71(1):165-169.
[PubMed: 11216739]
20. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Canosa C, Di Giammarco G, Iaco AL, et al: Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: advantages, disadvantages and similarities.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24(6):953-960.
[PubMed: 14643814]
21. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, Nathoe HM, Suyker WJ, et al: Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001; 104(15):1761-1766.
22. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, et al: A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery.
NEJM 2004; 350(1):21-28.
[PubMed: 14702424]
23. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, et al: On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.
NEJM 2009; 361(19):1827-1837.
[PubMed: 19890125]
24. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, et al: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125(4):797-808.
[PubMed: 12698142]
25. Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A, Manfredi J, Metra M, et al: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study.
Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76(3):778-782; discussion 783.
[PubMed: 12963199]
26. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, Jirasek K, Dvorak J, et al: One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial.
Circulation 2004; 110(22):3418-3423.
[PubMed: 15557371]
27. Magee MJ, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Mack MJ: Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1:II9-14.
28. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, Emery R, Magee MJ, et al: Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(1): 167-173.
[PubMed: 14752427]
29. Stamou SC, Jablonski KA, Hill PC, Bafi AS, Boyce SW, Corso PJ: Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass versus the conventional approach in high-risk patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(2):552-557.
[PubMed: 15680833]
30. Ascione R, Reeves BC, Rees K, Angelini GD: Effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in overweight patients.
Circulation 2002; 106(14):1764-1770.
[PubMed: 12356627]
31. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ: Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Anesthesiology 2005; 102(1):188-203.
[PubMed: 15618803]
32. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R: Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.
Lancet 2002; 359(9313):1194-1199.
[PubMed: 11955537]
33. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, Payne N, Cann C, et al: Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trial.
BMJ 2002; 325(7375):1268.
[PubMed: 12458242]
34. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, Walther T, Doll N, et al: Predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery delirium: effect of beating-heart (off-pump) surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(1):57-64.
[PubMed: 14752413]
35. Stamou SC, Jablonski KA, Pfister AJ, Hill PC, Dullum MK, et al: Stroke after conventional versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74(2):394-399.
[PubMed: 12173819]
36. Patel NC, Deodhar AP, Grayson AD, Pullan DM, Keenan DJ, et al: Neurological outcomes in coronary surgery: independent effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74(2):400-405; discussion 405-406.
[PubMed: 12173820]
37. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, Schilling LO, Falk V, et al: Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation.
Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(4):1162-1166.
[PubMed: 10800812]
38. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, Yamauchi H, Lau WT, et al: Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial.
Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76(1):18-25; discussion 25-26.
[PubMed: 12842506]
39. Scarborough JE, White W, Derilus FE, Mathew JP, Newman MF, et al: Combined use of off-pump techniques and a sutureless proximal aortic anastomotic device reduces cerebral microemboli generation during coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126(5): 1561-1567.
[PubMed: 14666033]
40. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD: On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function.
Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(2):493-498.
[PubMed: 10475418]
41. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Janey PA, et al: Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(3):704-710.
[PubMed: 10750747]
42. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, Schmitt DV, Doll N, et al: On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact on postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy.
Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77(4):1250-1256.
[PubMed: 15063246]
43. Ascione R, Nason G, Al-Ruzzeh S, Ko C, Ciulli F, et al: Coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency.
Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72(6):2020-2025.
[PubMed: 11789787]
44. Weerasinghe A, Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Casula R, Tekkis PP, et al: Functional renal outcome in on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization: a propensity-based analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(5): 1577-1583.
[PubMed: 15854936]
45. Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Mangoush O, Al-Ruzzeh S, Nair S, et al: Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation? A question revisited.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26(4):701-710.
[PubMed: 15450560]
46. Rastan AJ, Bittner HB, Gummert JF, Walther T, Schewick CV, et al: On-pump beating heart versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery-evidence of pump-induced myocardial injury.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27(6):1057-1064.
[PubMed: 15896617]
47. Dybdahl B, Wahba A, Haaverstad R, Kirkeby-Garstad I, Kierulf P, et al: On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: more heat-shock protein 70 is released after on-pump surgery.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25(6):985-992.
[PubMed: 15144999]
48. Diegeler A, Doll N, Rauch T, Haberer D, Walther T, et al: Humoral immune response during coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of limited approach, "off-pump" technique, and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 2000; 102(19 Suppl 3):III95-100.
49. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, et al: A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients.
NEJM 2003; 348(5):394-402.
[PubMed: 12556542]
50. MacGillivray TE, Vlahakes GJ: Patency and the pump—the risks and benefits of off-pump CABG.
NEJM 2004; 350(1):3-4.
[PubMed: 14702419]
51. Calafiore AM, Giammarco GD, Teodori G, Bosco G, D'Annunzio E, et al: Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61(6):1658-1663; discussion 1664-1655.
[PubMed: 8651765]
52. Cremer J, Struber M, Wittwer T, Ruhparwar A, Harringer W, et al: Off-bypass coronary bypass grafting via minithoracotomy using mechanical epicardial stabilization. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63(6 Suppl):S79-83.
53. Subramanian
VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience.
Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(6):1648-1653; discussion 1654-1645.
[PubMed: 9436550]
54. Diegeler A, Matin M, Kayser S, Binner C, Autschbach R, et al: Angiographic results after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15(5):680-684.
[PubMed: 10386417]
55. Bucerius J, Metz S, Walther T, Falk V, Doll N, et al: Endoscopic internal thoracic artery dissection leads to significant reduction of pain after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73(4):1180-1184.
[PubMed: 11996260]
56. Wolf RK, Ohtsuka T, Flege JB, Jr: Early results of thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest using an ultrasonic scalpel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 14 Suppl 1:S54-57.
57. Duhaylongsod FG, Mayfield WR, Wolf RK: Thoracoscopic harvest of the internal thoracic artery: a multicenter experience in 218 cases.
Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(3):1012-1017.
[PubMed: 9768992]
58. Mack MJ, Magovern JA, Acuff TA, Landreneau RJ, Tennison DM, et al: Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(2):383-389; discussion 389-390.
[PubMed: 10475401]
59. Kettering K, Dapunt O, Baer FM: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review.
J Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 45(3): 255-264.
[PubMed: 15179338]
60. Gummert JF, Funkat A, Krian A: Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2004: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
Thorac Cardiovascular Surg 2005; 53(6):391-399.
[PubMed: 16311982]
61. de Canniere D, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Cichon R, Gulielmos V, Van Praet F, et al: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134(3):710-716.
62. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, Gallina S, Maddestra N, et al: Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (LAST operation).
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115(4):763-771.
[PubMed: 9576208]
63. Mehran R, Dangas G, Stamou SC, Pfister AJ, Dullum MK, et al: One-year clinical outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
Circulation 2000; 102(23):2799-2802.
[PubMed: 11104735]
64. Mariani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Peels JO, Monnink SH, et al: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary angioplasty for isolated type C stenosis of the left anterior descending artery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114(3):434-439.
[PubMed: 9305197]
65. Fraund S, Herrmann G, Witzke A, Hedderich J, Lutter G, et al: Midterm follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention techniques.
Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(4):1225-1231.
[PubMed: 15797053]
66. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, et al: Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
NEJM 2002; 347(8):561-566.
[PubMed: 12192015]
67. Shirai K, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Costantini CO, et al: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.
Am J Cardiol 2004; 93(8):959-962.
[PubMed: 15081435]
68. Thiele H, Oettel S, Jacobs S, Hambrecht R, Sick P, et al: Comparison of bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: a 5-year follow-up.
Circulation 2005; 112(22):3445-3450.
[PubMed: 16316966]
69. Reeves BC, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Taylor FC, Cripps T, et al: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 2004; 8(16):1-43.
[PubMed: 15080865]
70. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Walther T, Mochalski M, Mohr FW, et al: Cumulative sum failure analysis for eight surgeons performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134(3):663-669.
[PubMed: 17723815]
71. Thiele H, Neumann-Schniedewind P, Jacobs S, Boudriot E, Walther T, et al: Randomized comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery versus sirolimus-eluting stenting in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(25):2324-2331.
[PubMed: 19539141]
72. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, Walther T, Thiele H, et al: Seven-year follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: experience with more than 1300 patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83(1): 108-114.
[PubMed: 17184640]
73. Falk V, McLoughlin J, Guthart G, Salisbury JK, Walther T, et al: Dexterity enhancement in endoscopic surgery by a computer-controlled mechanical wrist. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 1999; 8(4):235-242.
74. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Jacobs S, Raumans J, et al: Total endoscopic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Heart Surg Forum 2000; 3(1):29-31.
[PubMed: 11064543]
75. Damiano RJ Jr, Ehrman WJ, Ducko CT, Tabaie HA, Stephenson ER Jr, et al: Initial United States clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119(1):77-82.
[PubMed: 10612764]
76. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, et al: Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118(1):11-16.
[PubMed: 10384178]
77. Kappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, Gulielmos V, Matschke K, et al: Wrist-enhanced instrumentation: moving toward totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70(3):1105-1108.
[PubMed: 11016388]
78. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, Oehlinger A, Wiedemann D, et al: Effectiveness and safety of total endoscopic left internal mammary artery bypass graft to the left anterior descending artery.
American J Cardiol 2009; 104(12):1684-1688.
[PubMed: 19962475]
79. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Loscher N, Vogel B, et al: Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system.
Heart Surg Forum 1999; 2(3):199-205.
[PubMed: 11276475]
80. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Banusch J, Brucerius J, et al: Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17(1):38-45.
[PubMed: 10735410]
81. Kappert U, Cichon R, Schneider J, Gulielmos V, Ahmadzade T, et al: Technique of closed chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20(4):765-769.
[PubMed: 11574222]
82. Srivastava S, Gadasalli S, Agusala M, Kolluru R, Naidu J, et al: Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81(3): 800-806; discussion 806.
[PubMed: 16488676]
83. Subramanian
VA, Patel NU, Patel NC, Loulmet DF: Robotic assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with port-access stabilization and cardiac positioning: paving the way for outpatient coronary surgery?
Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(5):1590-1596; discussion 1590-1596.
[PubMed: 15854938]
84. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, Pothula VR, Mesana TG, et al: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation 2009; 120(11 Suppl):S78-84.
85. Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, Bosco G, Calafiore AM: Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation.
Lancet 1996; 347(9003):757-758.
[PubMed: 8602013]
86. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV: Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(3):599-605.
[PubMed: 9307445]
87. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, et al: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
NEJM 2009; 360(10):961-972.
[PubMed: 19228612]
88. DeRose JJ: Current state of integrated "hybrid" coronary revascularization.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 21(3):229-236.
[PubMed: 19942121]
89. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, Merk D, Walther T, et al: Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization.
Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(6):1856-1860.
[PubMed: 19021994]
90. Mack MJ, Brown DL, Sankaran A: Minimally invasive coronary bypass for protected left main coronary stenosis angioplasty.
Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(2):545-546.
[PubMed: 9262614]
91. Friedrich GJ, Bonatti J: Hybrid coronary artery revascularization—review and update 2007. Heart Surg Forum 2007; 10(4):E292-296.
92. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D, Murphy D, Siwek L, et al: Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2006; 114(1 Suppl):I473-476.
93. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, Jonetzko P, Ohlinger A, et al: Treatment of double vessel coronary artery disease by totally endoscopic bypass surgery and drug-eluting stent placement in one simultaneous hybrid session. Heart Surg Forum 2005; 8(4):E284-286.
94. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, Laufer G, Kolbitsch C, et al: Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass and catheter based coronary intervention in one operative session.
Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(6):2138-2141.
[PubMed: 15919329]
95. Wittwer T, Haverich A, Cremer J, Boonstra P, Franke U, et al: Follow-up experience with coronary hybrid-revascularisation.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 48(6):356-359.
[PubMed: 11145404]
96. Goldsborough MA, Miller MH, Gibson J, Creighton-Kelly S, Custer CA, et al: Prevalence of leg wound complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: determination of risk factors.
Am J Crit Care 1999; 8(3):149-153.
[PubMed: 10228655]
97. Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Matheny RG, et al: Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial.
Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(1):26-31; discussion 31-22.
[PubMed: 9692434]
98. Bonde P, Graham A, MacGowan S: Endoscopic vein harvest: early results of a prospective trial with open vein harvest. Heart Surg Forum 2002; 5 Suppl 4:S378-391.
99. Bonde P, Graham AN, MacGowan SW: Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations.
Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77(6):2076-2082.
[PubMed: 15172271]
100. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Darzi A: Minimally invasive conduit harvesting: a systematic review.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29(3):324-333.
[PubMed: 16387505]
101. Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W, Connolly M, Edgerton J, et al: Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled trials. Innovations 2005; 1(2):61-74.
102. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED, et al; Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery.
NEJM 2009; 361(3):235-244.
[PubMed: 19605828]
103. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth KJ, MacPherson C, Ali IM, et al: Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89(2): 403-408.
[PubMed: 20103309]
104. Coppoolse R, Rees W, Krech R, Hufnagel M, Seufert K, et al: Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16 Suppl 2:S61-66.
105. Crouch JD, O'Hair DP, Keuler JP, Barragry TP, Werner PH, et al: Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality.
Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(4):1513-1516.
[PubMed: 10543557]
106. Meharwal ZS, Trehan N: Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases.
Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72(5): 1557-1561.
[PubMed: 11722043]
107. Denton TA, Trento L, Cohen M, Kass RM, Blanche C, et al: Radial artery harvesting for coronary bypass operations: neurologic complications and their potential mechanisms.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121(5):951-956.
[PubMed: 11326239]
108. Tatoulis J, Royse AG, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Skillington PD, et al: The radial artery in coronary surgery: a 5-year experience—clinical and angiographic results.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73(1):143-147; discussion 147-148.
[PubMed: 11834001]
109. Connolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ, Patel NU, McCabe JC, et al: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74(2):502-505; discussion 506.
[PubMed: 12173836]
110. Casselman FP, La Meir M, Cammu G, Wellens F, De Geest R, et al; Initial experience with an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128(3):463-466.
[PubMed: 15354109]
111. Patel AN, Henry
AC, Hunnicutt C, Cockerham CA, Willey B, et al: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique.
Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78(1):149-153; discussion 149-153.
[PubMed: 15223420]
112. Medalion B, Tobar A, Yosibash Z, Stamler A, Sharoni E, et al: Vasoreactivity and histology of the radial artery: comparison of open versus endoscopic approaches.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34(4):845-849.
[PubMed: 18656378]
113. Ito N, Tashiro T, Morishige N, Iwahashi H, Nishimi M, et al: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: the initial clinical experience and results of the first 50 patients. Heart Surg Forum 2009; 12(6):E310-315.
114. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, Ruzicka D, Wottke M, et al: Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134(3):649-656.
[PubMed: 17723813]
115. Nishida S, Kikuchi Y, Watanabe G, Takata M, Ito S, Kawachi K: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: patient satisfaction and complications.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2008; 16(1):43-46.
[PubMed: 18245705]