2. Moore W: The Knife Man: The Extraordinary Life and Times of John Hunter, Father of Modern Surgery. New York,Broadway Books,2005.
3. Codman E: A Study in Hospital Efficiency as Demonstrated by the Case Report of the First Five Years of a Private Hospital. Boston, Thomas Todd Company, 1917.
4. Daniels M, Hill A: Chemotherapy of pulmonary tuberculosis in young adults.An analysis of the combinedresults of three Medical Research Council trials. Br Med J
5. Cochrane A: Effectiveness & Efficiency.Random Reflections on Health Services. London, Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, 1971.
6. Donabedian A, Bashshur R: An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003.
7. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2000.
8. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ: Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg
9. Kallis P, Unsworth-White J, Munsch C, et al: Disability and distress following cardiac surgery in patients over 70 years of age. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
1993;7:306-311; discussion 312.
10. Herlitz J, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Evander MH, et al: Quality of life 15 years after coronary artery bypass grafting. Coron Artery Dis
11. Krane M, Bauernschmitt R, Hiebinger A, et al: Cardiac reoperation in patients aged 80 years and older. Ann Thorac Surg
12. O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, et al: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2–isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:S23-42.
13. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, et al: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1–coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:S2-22.
14. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, et al: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3—valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:S43-62.
15. Kozower BD, Ailawadi G, Jones DR, et al: Predicted risk of mortality models: surgeons need to understand limitations of the University HealthSystem Consortium models. J Am Coll Surg
16. Steen PM, Brewster AC
, Bradbury RC, Estabrook E, Young JA: Predicted probabilities of hospital death as a measure of admission severity of illness. Inquiry
17. Tu JV, Jaglal SB, Naylor CD: Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Circulation
18. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al: The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest
19. Dupuis JY: Predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery: risk stratification matters? Curr Opin Cardiol
20. Blackstone EH: Breaking down barriers: helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
21. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Nussmeier N, Blackstone EH: Gender and outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
22. Iezzoni LI: Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes, 3rd ed. Chicago, Health Administration Press, 2003.
23. Zalkind DL, Eastaugh SR: Mortality rates as an indicator of hospital quality. Hosp Health Serv Adm
24. Park RE, Brook RH, Kosecoff J, et al: Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA
25. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al: Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA
26. de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM: How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003;56:221-229.
27. Woodworth GF, Baird CJ, Garces-Ambrossi G, Tonascia J, Tamargo RJ: Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery
2009;65:251-256; discussion 256-257.
28. Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al: Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Inquiry 2000;31:40-55.
29. Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD: Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol
30. Jones RH, Hannan EL, Hammermeister KE, et al: Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Working Group Panel on the Cooperative CABG Database Project.J Am Coll Cardiol
31. Lippmann RP, Shahian DM: Coronary artery bypass risk prediction using neural networks. Ann Thorac Surg
32. Ferraris VA
, Ferraris SP: Assessing the medical literature: let the buyer beware. Ann Thorac Surg
33. Burns ER, Billett HH, Frater RW, Sisto DA: The preoperative bleeding time as a predictor of postoperative hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
34. Ferraris VA
, Berry WR, Klingman RR: Comparison of blood reinfusion techniques used during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg
1993;56:433-439; discussion 440.
35. Ferraris VA
, Gildengorin V: Predictors of excessive blood use after coronary artery bypass grafting. A multivariate analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
36. Gewirtz AS, Miller ML, Keys TF: The clinical usefulness of the preoperative bleeding time. Arch Patho lLab Med
37. Freiman JA, Chalmers TC
, Smith HJ, Kuebler RR: The importance of Beta, the type II error, and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized controlled trial.in Bailar JC, Mosteller F (eds):Medical Uses of Statistics.
Boston, NEJM Books, 1992; pp 357-373.
38. Ferraris VA
, Ferraris SP: Risk stratification and comorbidity,in Cohn LH, Edmunds LH (eds):Cardiac Surgery in the Adult.
New York,McGraw-Hill, 2003, pp 187-224.
39. Cook NR: Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation
40. Guadagnoli E, Hauptman PJ, Ayanian JZ, et al: Variation in the use of cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction. NEJM
41. Tobler HG, Sethi GK, Grover FL, et al: Variations in processes and structures of cardiac surgery practice. Medical Care 1995;33:OS43-58.
42. Maddux FW, Dickinson TA, Rilla D, et al: Institutional variability of intraoperative red blood cell utilization in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am J Med Qual
43. Magner D, Mirocha J, Gewertz BL: Regional variation in the utilization of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg
2009;49:893-901; discussion 901.
44. Harris KM, Pastorius CA, Duval S, et al: Practice variation among cardiovascular physicians in management of patients with mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol
45. Schneider EC
, Leape LL, Weissman JS, et al: Racial differences in cardiac revascularization rates: does “overuse” explain higher rates among white patients? AnnIntern Med
46. Philbin EF, McCullough PA, DiSalvo TG, et al: Underuse of invasive procedures among Medicaid patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health
47. Filardo G, Maggioni AP, Mura G, et al: The consequences of under-use of coronary revascularization; results of a cohort study in Northern Italy. Eur Heart J
48. Alter DA, Austin PC, Tu JV: Community factors, hospital characteristics and inter-regional outcome variations following acute myocardial infarction in Canada. Can J Cardiol
49. Sonel AF, Good CB, Mulgund J, et al: Racial variations in treatment and outcomes of black and white patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines?). Circulation
50. Ferraris VA
, Ferraris SP, Saha SP, et al: Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg
51. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al: ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:e213-310.
52. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC, Jr.: Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA
53. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J: Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA
54. Enhancing the use of clinical guidelines: a social norms perspective. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:826-836.
55. Goodnough LT, Despotis GJ: Establishing practice guidelines for surgical blood management. Am J Surg 1995;170:16S-20S.
56. Stover EP, Siegel LC, Body SC, et al: Institutional variability in red blood cell conservation practices for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Institutions of the MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
57. Austin PC: The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making
58. Barbour G: The role of outcomes data in health care reform. Ann Thorac Surg
59. Albanese M, Mejicano G, Xakellis G, Kokotailo P: Physician practice change I: a critical review and description of an Integrated Systems Model. Acad Med
60. Lenfant C: Shattuck lecture—clinical research to clinical practice—lost in translation? NEJM
61. Heffner JE: Altering physician behavior to improve clinical performance. Top Health Inf Manage
62. Anonymous: The oversight of medical care: a proposal for reform. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:423-431.
63. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Ferraris VA
, et al: Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 1—Conceptual framework and measure selection. Ann Thorac Surg
64. Casale AS, Paulus RA, Selna MJ, et al: “ProvenCareSM”: a provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Ann Surg
2007;246:613-621; discussion 621-613.
65. Karve AM, Ou FS, Lytle BL, Peterson ED: Potential unintended financial consequences of pay-for-performance on the quality of care for minority patients. Am Heart J
66. Daley J: Criteria by which to evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes programs in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg
67. Daley J: Validity of risk-adjustment methods,in Iezzoni LI (ed):Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes. Chicago, Health Administration Press, 1997; pp 331-363.
68. Ferraris VA
, Ferraris SP: Risk factors for postoperative morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
69. Shroyer ALW, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, et al: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg
2003;75:1856-1864; discussion 1864-1855.
70. Lee TH, Shammash JB, Ribeiro JP: Estimation of maximum oxygen
uptake from clinical data: performance of the Specific Activity Scale. Am Heart J
71. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care
72. Lee TH, American College of Cardiology. Private Sector Relations Committee: Evaluating the Quality of Cardiovascular Care: a Primer. Bethesda, MD, American College of Cardiology, 1995.
73. Cope DW, Linn LS, Leake BD, Barrett PA: Modification of residents' behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med
74. Peric V, Borzanovic M, Stolic R, et al: Quality of life in patients related to gender differences before and after coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc ThoracSurg
75. Lee GA: Determinants of quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung
76. Tully PJ, Baker RA, Turnbull DA, et al: Negative emotions and quality of life six months after cardiac surgery: the dominant role of depression not anxiety symptoms. J Behav Med
77. Jideus L, Liss A, Stahle E: Patients with sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery do not improve their quality of life. Scand Cardiovasc J
78. Loponen P, Luther M, Korpilahti K, et al: HRQoL after coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina. Scand Cardiovasc J
79. Guadagnoli E, Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD: Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after elective coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged greater than or equal to and less than 65 years. Am J Cardiol
80. Rumsfeld JS, Magid DJ, O'Brien M, et al.: Changes in health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
81. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M, et al: Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA
82. O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, DeLong ER, et al: Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 2—Statistical considerations in composite measure scoring and provider rating. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S13-26.
83. Smith PK, Mayer JE, Jr., Kanter KR, et al: Physician payment for 2007: a description of the process by which major changes in valuation of cardiothoracic surgical procedures occurred. Ann Thorac Surg
84. Deming WE: Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.
85. Juran JM: A History of Managing for Quality: The Evolution, Trends, and Future Directions of Managing for Quality. Milwaukee, WI, ASQC Quality Press, 1995.
86. Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J, National Demonstration Project on Quality Improvement in Health Care: Curing Health Care: New Strategies for Quality Improvement. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1990.
87. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al: Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation
88. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al: A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA
89. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al: A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA
90. Birkmeyer NJ, Charlesworth DC, Hernandez F, et al: Obesity and risk of adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation
91. Braxton JH, Marrin CA, McGrath PD, et al: 10-year follow-up of patients with and without mediastinitis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
92. Hernandez F, Cohn WE, Baribeau YR, et al: In-hospital outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass procedures: a multicenter experience. Ann Thorac Surg
2001;72:1528-1533; discussion 1533-1524.
93. Green J, Wintfeld N: Report Cards on Cardiac-Surgeons—Assessing New-York States Approach. NEJM
94. Omoigui N, Annan K, Brown K, et al: Potential explanation for decreased CABG-related mortality in NewYorkState: outmigration to Ohio. Circulation 1994;90:93.
95. Ferraris VA
: The dangers of gathering data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
96. Morgan RO, Virnig BA, DeVito CA, Persily NA: The Medicare-HMO revolving door—the healthy go in and the sick go out. NEJM
97. Schneider EC
, Epstein AM: Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA
98. Schneider EC
, Epstein AM: Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. NEJM
99. Burack JH, Impellizzeri P, Homel P, Cunningham JN, Jr: Public reporting of surgical mortality: a survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg
1999;68:1195-1200; discussion 1201-1192.
100. Dranove D, Kessler D, McClellan M, Satterthwaite M: Is more information better? The effects of 'report cards' on health care providers. JPolitical Economy 2003;111:555-588.
101. Moscucci M, Eagle KA, Share D, et al: Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases. J Am Coll Cardiol
102. Apolito RA, Greenberg MA, Menegus MA, et al: Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J
103. Resnic FS, Welt FG: The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol
104. Narins CR, Dozier AM, Ling FS, Zareba W: The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians. Arch Intern Med
105. Glance LG, Dick A, Mukamel DB, et al: Are high-quality cardiac surgeons less likely to operate on high-risk patients compared to low-quality surgeons? Evidence from New York State. Health Serv Res
106. Daley J: Validity of risk-adjustment methods,in Iezzoni L (ed):Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, MI, Health Administration Press, 1994; p 239.
107. Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF: Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation
108. Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER: Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med
109. Blumberg MS: Comments on HCFA hospital death rate statistical outliers. Health Care Financing Administration. Health Serv Res
110. Dubois RW: Hospital mortality as an indicator of quality,in Goldfield N, Nash DB (eds):Providing Quality Care. Philadelphia, American College of Physicians, 1989; pp 107-131.
111. Podolsky D, Beddingfield KT: America's best hospitals. U.S. News and World Report
112. Shahian DM, Torchiana DF, Normand SL: Implementation of a cardiac surgery report card: lessons from the Massachusetts experience. Ann Thorac Surg
113. Hannan EL, Kumar D, Racz M, Siu AL, Chassin MR: New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: four years later. Ann Thorac Surg.
114. Shahian DM, Torchiana DF, Shemin RJ, Rawn JD, Normand SL: Massachusetts cardiac surgery report card: implications of statistical methodology. Ann Thorac Surg
115. Goldstein H, Spiegelhalter DJ: League tables and their limitations:statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance (with discussion). J R Stat Soc (Series A) 1996;159:385-443.
116. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU: Costs of care and administration at for-profit and other hospitals in the United States. NEJM
117. Anonymous: Iowa:Classic test of a future concept. Medical Outcomes & Guidelines Alert 1995:8.
118. Tu JV, Donovan LR, Lee DS, et al: Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial. JAMA
119. Jacobs JP, Cerfolio RJ, Sade RM: The ethics of transparency: publication of cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in the lay press. Ann Thorac Surg
120. Spiegelhalter DJ: Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med
121. Brennan TA, Gawande A, Thomas E, Studdert D: Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality. NEJM
122. Leape LL, Berwick DM: Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? JAMA
123. Kolata G: Program Coaxes Hospitals to See Treatments Under Their Noses New York Times on the web. New York.December 25, 2004.
124. Leape LL, Weissman JS, Schneider EC
, et al: Adherence to practice guidelines: the role of specialty society guidelines. Am Heart J
125. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA: ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol
126. Petitti D: Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Vol 31, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.
127. Hunink MG: In search of tools to aid logical thinking and communicating about medical decision making. Med Decis Making
128. Gage BF, Cardinalli AB, Albers GW, Owens DK: Cost-effectiveness of warfarin
for prophylaxis of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA
129. Breiman L: Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci 2001;16:199-231.
130. Shahian DM: Improving cardiac surgery quality—volume, outcome, process? JAMA
131. Shahian DM, Normand SL: The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg
132. Shahian DM, Normand SL: Low-volume coronary artery bypass surgery: measuring and optimizing performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
133. Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK, Ferguson TB: Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. JAMA
134. Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, et al: Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg
135. Nallamothu BK, Saint S, Ramsey SD, et al: The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: Is more always better? J Am Coll Cardiol
136. Nallamothu BK, Eagle KA, Ferraris VA
, Sade RM: Should coronary artery bypass grafting be regionalized? Ann Thorac Surg
137. Rathore SS, Epstein AJ, Volpp KG, Krumholz HM: Hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery volume and patient mortality, 1998-2000. Ann Surg
138. Hannan EL: Workshop summary,in Hewitt M, America CoQoHCi, Board NCP (eds):Interpreting the Volume-Outcome Relationship in the Context of Health Care Quality: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, 2000; p 11.
139. Carthey J: The role of structured observational research in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12 Suppl 2:ii13-16.
140. Richardson WC, Berwick DM, Bisgard JC, et al: The Institute of Medicine Report on Medical Errors: misunderstanding can do harm. Quality of Health Care in America Committee. 2000:E42.
141. de-Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, Farewell VT, Reason JT: Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
142. Longman P: Best care anywhere: why VA health care is better than yours
. Sausalito, CA, PoliPointPress,Distributed by Publishers Group West, 2007.
143. Iezzoni L: Measuring the severity of illness and case mix,in Goldfield ND (ed):Providing Quality Care: The Challenge to Clinicians. Philadelphia, American College of Physicians, 1989:70-105.
144. D'Avolio LW: Electronic medical records at a crossroads: impetus for change or missed opportunity? JAMA
145. Langdorf MI, Fox JC, Marwah RS, Montague BJ, Hart MM: Physician versus computer knowledge of potential drug interactions in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med
146. Classen DC, Avery AJ, Bates DW: Evaluation and certification of computerized provider order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc
147. Grunkemeier GL, Zerr KJ, Jin R: Cardiac surgery report cards:making the grade. Ann Thorac Surg
148. Lahey SJ, Borlase BC, Lavin PT, Levitsky S: Preoperative risk factors that predict hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients > 60 years old. Circulation 1992;86:II181-185.
149. Hammermeister KE, Johnson R, Marshall G, Grover FL: Continuous assessment and improvement in quality of care. A model from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cardiac Surgery. Ann Surg