RT Book, Section A1 Rice, Thomas W. A2 Sugarbaker, David J. A2 Bueno, Raphael A2 Colson, Yolonda L. A2 Jaklitsch, Michael T. A2 Krasna, Mark J. A2 Mentzer, Steven J. A2 Williams, Marcia A2 Adams, Ann SR Print(0) ID 1105838433 T1 Esophageal Cancer Staging T2 Adult Chest Surgery, 2e YR 2015 FD 2015 PB McGraw-Hill Education PP New York, NY SN 978-0-07-178189-3 LK accesssurgery.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1105838433 RD 2024/04/19 AB Cancer staging is an evolutionary process. The Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) esophageal cancer staging, first introduced in 1968, rapidly developed, but unfortunately then stagnated for decades. T classifications had not changed since 1988, N classifications for thoracic esophageal cancer since 1977, and M classifications since 1997. The principal hindrance to evolution was the long held concept of stage groupings of esophageal cancer which was incorrectly based on a simple, orderly arrangement of increasing anatomic T, then N, then M classifications. This assumption was consistent with neither cancer biology nor survival data. Worldwide collaboration1 has provided data for a unique, modern machine-learning analysis2 that has produced data-driven staging for cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ).3 This new system is the basis for the 7th editions of the AJCC and UICC Cancer Staging Manuals.4,5 It is more representative of and consistent with the survival following esophagectomy of patients with esophageal cancer. The changes address problems of empiric stage grouping and prior disharmony with stomach cancer staging. In addition, TNM classifications have been reviewed and revised where data analysis and consensus demonstrated a need for change. For the first time, nonanatomic cancer characteristics, primary cancer site (location), histologic grade (grade), and histopathologic type (cell type) are incorporated in esophageal cancer staging.